Coming soon!

My presentation at the conference “Agency, causality, and free will”: Zagreb, Croatia, 25-28 Jan 2016

My presentation there in PDF: Equilibrium in Nash’s mind with references

In PowerPoint: Equilibrium in Nash’s mind with references

Coming soon!

Lisbon, New University, 5-6 Nov 2015

In: “Schizophrenia and common sense”: http://schizophreniacommonsense.weebly.com/

The program: http://schizophreniacommonsense.weebly.com/program.html

Information and Communication

Thursday, October 8th, 18:15 – 19:00
Vilnius university: Faculty of Philosophy
Models of Communication:
Theoretical and Philosophical Approaches
Vilnius, 8-10 October 2015


history2015final (The program of the conference)

Hattiesburg (presentation in pdf)

  • The talk addresses a philosophical comparison and thus interpretation of both theorems having one and the same subject:
  • The absence of the “other half” of variables, called “hidden” for that, to the analogical set of variables in classical mechanics:
  • These theorems are:
  • John’s von Neumann’s (1932)
  • Simon Kochen and Ernst Specker’s (1968)

Hattiesburg (presentation in pptx)

program (of this conference)

Nijmegen (presentation in pdf)

  • A formal model of metaphor is introduced. It models metaphor, first, as an interaction of “frames” according to the frame semantics, and then, as a “wave function” in Hilbert space
  • The practical way for a probability distribution and a corresponding wave function to be assigned to a given metaphor in a given language is considered
  • A series of formal definitions is deduced from this for: “representation”, “reality”, “language” “ontology”. All are based on Hilbert space
  • A few statements about a quantum computer are implied:
    • The so-defined reality is inherent and internal to it
    • It can report a result only “metaphorically”
    • It will demolish transmitting the result “literally”, i.e. absolutely exactly
    • A new and different formal definition is introduced as a few entangled wave functions corresponding to different “signs” in different language formally defined as above
    • The change of frames as the change from the one to the other formal definition of metaphor is interpreted as a formal definition of thought

Nijmegen (presntation in pptx)



  • How should skepticism refer to itself?
  • The classical example might be the doubt of Descartes, which led him to the necessary obviousness of who doubts
  • The formal logical structure is the same as the “antinomy of the Liar”
  • That new interpretation of it can be called “antinomy of the Skeptic
  • Descartes resolved it by introducing the meta-position and furthermore defining the “Self” just as that meta-position allows of any other position including that of doubt





The establishment of universal history requires to be understood what time is •Time is the transformation of the future into past by the choices in the present •History should be grounded on that understanding of historical time, which would include the present and future rather than only the past



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.